Category: Deep Thoughts
July 10th, 2006

Show us your briefs– Part I

Einsteinhair_2Combined the Mortar gang has three quarters of a century of experience in advertising and I am proud to report we are still not happy with our briefs. 

In the hope that the Truth Really Is Out There, here are ten thoughts on giving  good  brief:

What is a Creative Brief? 

Simply put, the written instructions to creative. Typically developed after research into a marketing problem the brief marks the transition from the account team to creative.

Be warned, many people (particularly Creative Directors) believe there is no such thing as a Great Brief. Take Jeremy Diamond at Ogilvy:

“Everyone remembers [Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel] but no one remembers the brief. No one ever built a great brand by writing great briefs. The truth is that there is no such thing a great brief-only a brief which leads to a great creative idea”.

To a degree, Jerry has a point. As hard as it is to squeeze all that is known about a job into 350 words or less, the brief represents the jumping off point for the creative process, it’s something to be good at. What really matters is the end result.

Yet, a communications environment defined by consumers who are no longer loyal to a handful of media (were they ever?) demands a creative process that starts from a more fundamental point. For us, at Mortar, it has caused a general elevation of the briefing process into something much more critical and rigorous.

That’s enough waffle. On to THE DEEP THOUGHTS:

1. Briefs are Intellectual Property. They are secret.  Wise corporations don’t let anyone see their briefs. No wonder Agencies rarely publish them. After great work, effective briefs are the most important, if least discussed, part of our craft. In contrast to discussions about the end result, tantalizingly little is available online or off on the pivotal point at which Research and Insight become the marching orders for the Great Unwashed. [Unrepentent brief voyeurs are advised to avoid the AdPulp site simply becuase it posts details of Campbell Ewald’s brief for Kaiser Permanente’s $40 million Thrive campaign).

BTW a few years ago Mortar’s founding CD, Tim Spry, caught a glimpse of a Mad Dogs and Englishmen’s brief. We hired the next person who brought us a copy.

[Mad Dogs have since foundered which is a pity, as they had the second best Agency name in the business, the best belonging of course to Portland’s Wexley School for Girls].

2. Good briefs are short.

3. Briefs must be comprehensive. (I know that contradicts 2. but where did we say brief writing is easy?).

4. Your client should sign their brief in blood (we recommend pricking a digit, but full on dismemberment is not to be discouraged). Skip this stage at your peril. Although it is common in consumer product marketing meetings (well it happened to me once), we don’t recommend going as far as conducting a "Reading of the brief" at the beginning of each meeting. It’s a downer.

5. The brief is a living and breathing document. It should be delivered verbally and supported in writing. If you are commenting on the brief exclusively via email you’re missing the point. The discussion is the brief.

6. If you are a client do not add any words to a brief. The brief is a work of art. You either like it or you don’t. Just as you would never art direct your agency (you wouldn’t do that, right?) briefs are black and white. Don’t settle until you can agree with every word.

7. Oh, and clients? The brief is for your Agency’s creative team, not you. It needs to set them off. Get them all loopy. Great briefs cause gales of laughter. Insightful and odd, fresh briefs are good. Banal briefs are bad. Briefs that provoke profanity and consternation should be culled at birth and turned into a fancy pelt coat for someone else’s brand, preferably the competition.

8. At a minimum good briefs attempt to answer these questions:

– What are we selling?
– What do we want to accomplish?
– Why will anyone care?
– What’s the idea?
– What is the communication challenge?
– What do we need to keep in mind?
– Who is our audience?
– What is our tone?
– Will England (ever) win the World Cup?

By the way, if the answers are easy coming you aren’t working hard enough.

9. Sleep on it. Like the ideas they are designed to provoke, great briefs hold their luster overnight. Bang out your brief. Share it around. Then sleep with it before sharing.

10. Watch over your brief. Once your baby is out in the world, she will get to hang out with all kinds of characters. Hopefully you brought her up well and she’ll behave. But every now and again she’ll test her limits and do something silly. So be sure to check in with her every now and then. 

Consider, the true genius of Fallon’s "unbanking" campaign for financial services behemoth Citibank lies not in the initial idea, but their ability to keep Citi’s work fresh and on brief (and us chuckling) for over 5 years (yes, it’s been that long):

CitifamFallon Minneapolis, winner of this year’s Plan of the Year for newspaper advertising, snagged the Citibank account by promising to be "unbanklike" in its approach. The result: a series of whimsical ads promoting the bank’s various financial services, appearing in unorthodox sections of the paper and sporting catch phrases like "Sometimes wealth is buying the $6 popcorn and not obsessing over the fact that you just paid $6 for popcorn."

Another appeal, promoting Citibank’s home-equity line of credit, drew in readers with the hook: "There’s got to be at least $25,000 hidden in your house. We can help you find it."

Picture_23_1Still another spot showed up in the comics section, of all places. Alongside Peanuts and Doonesbury, the ad declared: "Sometimes wealth is having time to read these." – Brandweek, 2001

See more of Fallon’s Citi work here.

The opinions expressed in MortaBlog are not necessarily those of the author or anyone else at the Mortar for that matter.  Just who owns them is kind of unclear really.  If you do find someone who will own up to them for sure, let us know.

June 24th, 2006

Brands connecting with consumers. See it happen here.

Yesboobies

June 15th, 2006

99 of the Fortune 100 will not read this blog.

A VMware sponsorship message on KQED got me thinking this morning.

More than an elevator speech, radio sponsorship messages are the epitome of corporate brevity: to succeed you must encapsulate your entire reason for being in 30 words or less.

VMware’s message included this phrase:

"This message is brought to you by VMware. 99 of the Fortune 100 use Vmware. Go to VMware dot com for more details"

Now I wonder if the marketeer who crafted that message was thinking of Moore’s Chasm theory?

Moore’s work on the technology adoption cycle is as fresh today as it was back when it debuted in 1991 (before the Web, before iPods, before Dell, back when Casio and Digital Equipment were big tech brands and we were friends with Saddam and Osama).

We recently dug into "Crossing the Chasm" for some work in the tech sector and were astonished by the richness and depth of Moore’s analysis.

At the core of his work is the idea of a gap between early adopters and the rest of the market.

Galloway1_2

Early adopters actively cherish breakthrough ideas and latch onto new technology because it is innovative and exciting. They buy promises and seek first mover advantage.

On the other side of Moore’s chasm swells the much larger mass market, and the decidedly less innovative, go-with-the-flow, don’t-stick-your-neck-out, Sure,  I’ll-buy before-anyone-else but I’ll-need-some-references-first  segment which he identifies as "pragmatist":

Throughout the 1980s, the early majority, or pragmatists, have represented the bulk of the market volume for any technology product. You can succeed with the visionaries, and you can thereby get a reputation for being a high flyer with a hot product, but that is not ultimately where the dollars are. Instead, those funds are in the hands of more prudent souls, who do not want to be pioneers ("Pioneers are people with arrows in their backs"), who never volunteer to be an early test site, ("Let somebody else debug your product") and who have learned the hard way that the leading edge of technology is all too often the "bleeding edge".

By citing their credentials with the F100 VMware are solidly positioning themselves for success with pragmatists.

But, warns Moore, you only have one chance to impress visionaries. The adoption cycle runs from left to right, from early adopter to mass market, not vice versa.

And there is no backing up to the visionary segment once your product has crossed the chasm into the mainstream.

Now I don’t know VMware very well. And what I do know about virtualization technology could be pressed onto a gnat’s eyebrow (and still leave room for something meaningful).

They may well be the pragmatists choice.

But somehow I wonder if VMware wasn’t instead overly influenced by its larger and dominant parent, EMC (which is firmly and irrevocably a mainstream storage company) and rushed into this statement becuase they couldn’t think of anytjing more original to say.

It seems you can pack a lot into 30 words, afterall.

The opinions expressed in  Mortablog  are not necessarily those of the author or anyone else at the Mortar
for that matter.  Just who owns them is kind of unclear really.  If you
do find someone who will own up to them for sure, let us know.

June 12th, 2006

Diet Coke, Mentos & the Dixie Chicks throw down with Johnny Consumer.

Mentos_1
Two middle aged attorneys caused a stir last week by dropping 523 Mentos into 50 or so liter bottles of Diet Coke. To the delight of millions of online fans, Messers Voltz and Grobe uploaded a video of their low-cal symphony to Revver.com.

The result is a series of fizzy gushers that reach 20ft in height.

Mento’s marketing VP, Pete Healy, is quoted in today’s Journal as being "tickled pink" by the publicity.

Unlike Coke who turned up their noses at the phenomenon, "We would hope people want to drink it [Diet Coke] more than try experiments with it" sniffed Coke spokesperon Susan McDermott in the same Journal article. Ouch.

I bet she is squirming in her seat this morning.

So what does this have to do with the Dixie Chicks?

Renown for their Anti-Bush comments, the Texan Chicks have since changed format, added black eyeliner and gone all goth: and hard on the heels of alienating their country fan base by calling them all "rednecks" are now in the midst of cancelling half of their US  tour dates due to lack luster ticket sales.

As bands like the Chicks now make more from tours than they do from concert tours this is a painful development for the girls. Overseas sales, especially in Canada and Europe, remain brisk.   

One doubts those markets have quite the same revenue potential as the populous South.

There are lessons here for the global marketer: consumers have their own ideas about what they will buy–and why. They determine success in the market. Marketers are best advised to go with the flow.